Last
week I pulled together a statistical overview of the two-year-old thoroughbred
sales market. With the first breeze show of 2017 scheduled for Monday at
Gulfstream, and the first 2YO sale set for Wednesday, here’s some context for
those statistics and four thoughts about the future of the juvenile sales in
light of overall trends in racing.
First,
the 2YO sales scene has not shrunk at the same pace as the foal crop since the
2008 financial crisis. In 2005 – foals that could be offered at the 2007 2YO
sales – the North American foal crop was just over 35,000. In 2014 – foals that
could have been offered at the 2016 2YO sales – the foal crop was 20,450.
That’s a decline of 42% in a decade. In contrast, the major 2YO auction houses
(then including Keeneland) offered a total of just over 4,000 horses in 2016,
compared to 4,800 in 2007, a decline of only about 17%.
That
means the 2YO sales are presenting a bigger fraction of the total thoroughbred
foal crop than before the financial meltdown. A decade ago, roughly one of every
seven horses was catalogued in a 2YO sale; today, it’s more like one in five.
That could mean that more end-users (i.e., owners who actually want to race
horses) are using the juvenile auctions, but it also means that the sales
catalogs contain more horses with lesser potential. If you are taking more of
less, than the quality of what you are taking must have gone down. If 2YO sales
had moved in proportion to changes in the foal crop over the past decade, we
would now be seeing only about 2,800 in the catalogs, and not the 4,000 we can
expect by the time all this year’s sales are done. Not surprising, then, that
the number of horses sold as a percentage of catalog size has fallen off. It is
time for the auction houses to start exercising a little quality control and
shrink the catalogs.
Second,
the 2YO market has been vastly simplified. A decade ago, OBS ran five sales,
Fasig-Tipton five, Barrett’s two and Keeneland one. That’s now been
consolidated into the two F-T sales and the three big OBS offerings, plus two
at Barrett’s in California. That makes life simpler for consignors and buyers
and probably cuts transaction costs, which are ultimately passed on to
racehorse owners. (Though we still need better policing to make sure that
so-called “bloodstock agents” don’t cheat owners and consignors by insisting on
kickbacks from the latter while passing on an inflated price to the former. You
guys know who you are.)
Third,
we are still in thrall to the stopwatch. Yes, it’s true, as my friend Jeff
Seder of EQB, Inc., and others have proven, that horses that breeze faster
have, in the aggregate, more success on the racetrack than breeze show
slowpokes. But is there really that much difference between a horse that
breezes a furlong in 9.3 seconds compared to one breezing in 9.4? And how many
of those horses listed in the catalogs but then scratched before the sale were
victims of the aggressive training needed to get them ready for the sales ring?
Anecdotal, to be sure, but my Castle Village Farm partnership owns a nice
Broken Vow two-year-old of 2016 who might have fetched $75,000 at Timonium last
year had he not bucked shins. We bought him privately for $25,000 and he’ll
debut as a three-year-old next month; looks like he could be a useful horse,
and he would have been better off not being rushed.
Finally,
one must think about the place of these sales in the overall economy of racing.
The basic economics are simple: someone breeds a horse and either races it or
sells it. The person who races the horse pays the bills and gets the purse,
and, sometimes, a return from breeding. Basically, that’s all the money there
is, and as we all know, it’s not enough. Most horses don’t earn enough to pay
for their training, let alone their purchase or breeding cost. Most owners lose
money, which is pretty much the way it’s always been; being in the winners
circle makes up for the cost of a lot of hay. For some rich folks, escorting a
horse into a Grade 1 winners circle is more of a thrill than escorting an East
European model into a charity ball.
But
where does the money to pay for all the sales apparatus come from? The auction
houses, the bloodstock agents and the sales vets all are getting paid, and ultimately
that cost is coming from breeders and owners. In fact, that’s why the Florida
breeders set up OBS in the first place, to capture some of that transaction
cost for themselves. Today, with handle and purses flat in current dollars and
in long-term decline when inflation-adjusted, there’s just less money to go
around. Scaling back the 2YO sales would be a modest step in the direction of
recognizing that reality.